All posts by David Todd

Decision Time

Yesterday was 120 days after the day I submitted the partial manuscript of In Front of Fifty Thousand Screaming People to an agent, send at the agent’s request. Conventional wisdom is that you wait 3 or 4 months after submitting requested material, and if you haven’t heard back then a follow-up e-mail is appropriate. So I sent an e-mail, asking of the book was still under consideration.

The agent replied the same day with a nice e-mail, the gist of which is as follows.

I do really like your unique story concept that involves both professional baseball and the mafia. I’ve been reluctant to dismiss it. But addressing the sex, drugs, drinking, and lifestyle at the end of the story is too late for a Christian publisher to accept…. If these elements and the general market are the track you want to stay on, it isn’t a good fit for [our agency]. 

Here is a bit of feedback I’ll offer on the sample chapters you sent, though. There is too much dialogue at the expense of description and character development. There are some excellent books on writing…that would be beneficial for you in these areas. I hope you find this helpful.

I wish you great success and joy in the process as you continue to work on your writing. Let me know if at some point you decide to change direction on this story.

So, what to do? I sent a follow-up e-mail this morning, thanking her for her time to give me feedback, and asking her to clarify the comment that the sex, drugs, drinking, and lifestyle is “too late” for a Christian publisher. I’m not really sure what that means. It is introduced too late in the book? How does the placement affect acceptability? Plus, what she’s referring to was a disconnected scene, written early on during the writing but coming nearer to the end of the book than to the beginning to get if written while it was fresh on my mind. It dealt with a sexual situation that didn’t involve sex, if that makes sense.

Maybe she was saying that Christian readers, at least those used to reading books that come from the Christian Booksellers Association (CBA) are used to a certain absence of these subjects, except for the redeeming value of being released from one. If those subjects are absent from the beginning of the book, the typical CBA reader will read blissfully on. Then, if 2/3 of the way through they read something they’d rather have not read, they will be offended. Having put so much time into the reading, up to that point, they will be upset. That’s the only way I can interpret it.

So what to do now? Last night I was fixing typos found by my wife, through chapter 27. I’m soon to have an e-mail of some additional typos through the end of the book from my nephew.  Then I have to read the book for typos, for plot consistency and completeness, for line edits, etc. Then, taking the agent’s advice to heart, I have to see if there are places I can cut dialog and add to description/narrative. Plus, I have to wait on all my beta readers to report, and incorporate suggestions they make. At that point the book will be ready…but for what?

My choices are: 1) continue to submit to agents, 2) find some small presses who don’t require agented submittals and submit to them, 3) self-publish it, first as an e-book and soon thereafter as a print book, or 4) put it in a shoe box and let my kids find it when I assume room temperature.

Right now I’m favoring number 3. It will probably cost me $100 for a cover suitable for print and e-book, which I can ill afford right now. The print version will cost me $10 to have a proof copy produced and mailed. Or maybe I could just make up a cheapo cover and call it good. Either way I’ll get it published. The time required to do that will be a whole lot less than would be required to stay on the query-go-round with agents and publishers, leaving me more time for writing.

Simultaneous with that, or perhaps of a slightly higher priority, will be going through the proof copy of Documenting America, finding all the typos, correcting them, and uploading corrected files to Kindle, Smashwords, and CreateSpace. That will put a paper book of this in my hands, releasing me to ramp up the marketing.

After that, I suspect I’ll get Doctor Luke’s Assistant e-self-published, and add one more short story to my list of things for sale. At that time, I’ll re-assess, and make further decisions.

Initial beta-reader reports

In Front of Fifty Thousand Screaming People is out with the beta readers. Well, maybe not all, as I have at least one more to get it to. I have begun to receive reports.

The first reports had to do with typos. Many typos. I knew that when I sent it out. My wife has read about 2/3 of the book and marked typos as she went along. I took her mark up and made some corrections, but not nearly all. So I knew the version going out to beta readers had typos.

From Nov 3 through Nov 8 my wife and I travelled to Rhode Island via Oklahoma City to attend a funeral. During that time, during gatherings of family and friends, I was able to talk face to face with two of these beta readers. One has finished the book, and gave it good praise (not glowing, but good). Of course, he’s a Yankees fan, so I was expecting him to not like—wait, don’t want to reveal too much of the plot. He has been feeding me e-mails pointing out typos, but I was able to get his take on the whole book.

He said, in answer to my questions, that the scenes in the new Yankees Stadium were believable. I was wondering about that, so that’s good feedback. One of his comments was that, at the beginning of the book, there was nothing to ground the book in time. Since it was talking about the Mafia, he thought it was set some decades ago. However, further into the book I have some references that make it clear the book is contemporary. If I can add some similar references much earlier, then the book will be grounded in time. He also thought I didn’t have enough ethnic names in the book for ball players. I can look at that easily enough.

The other beta reader I met with had read through chapter 26, so about 60 percent into the book. He of course mentioned the typos. He also said that the mob girl in the book, who is playing a role much out of character for her, is not believable. No, that’s not exactly what he said. He said it’s hard to believe she could effectively play the role she’s called upon to play by her gangster boss. I’ll review that, and see if there’s any way I can improve her believability. She undergoes the greatest character arc of all the characters.

So, the feedback begins. I have the book out with four other beta readers, and will send it to one more tonight. I’m looking forward to the wide range of opinions I’m likely to receive.

Ratchet up, ratchet down, ratchet up

I’ve said before, it never fails but that when I try to ratchet up the amount of time I spend on writing, something always interrupts to get in the way. Or life becomes more complicated in some way. I was about to get back to writing this week, after not doing a whole lot the last two weeks while letting In Front of Fifty Thousand Screaming People simmer before beginning the editing.

However, while we were on a hasty, weekend trip to southwestern Kansas for a funeral in Lynda’s family, we got work that my brother passed away in Rhode Island. He was 57 years old, had been in poor health for many years, had been failing even more lately, and had been in much pain of late. We will travel to RI for the funeral this coming weekend.

So writing must be set aside for a while. On the trip I’ll carry the proof copy of Documenting America and give it a good proof-reading, with the intent of uploading a fresh copy next Tuesday. I may work on the short story, the sequel to “Mom’s Letter”, tentatively titled “Too Old To Play”. Beyond that, this week will be given to preparation for travel and then the travel itself. If I can sneak in a blog post before we leave on Friday, I will.

After that, I really need to ratchet things up again. I may have to write a few articles to get some money in the door.

Beta Readers

Last week I put out a call for beta readers for In Front of Fifty Thousand Screaming People. It was already in the hands of two people, one a relative one a friend, in a state of completion a few chapters away from being finished.  I haven’t received any feedback from them yet. But I decided to put out the call anyway and see what happened.

I mentioned this to Lynda and she asked, “What’s a beta reader?” I explained it is the next level of reader after the writer, who is the alpha reader. It is those who act as amateur editors and focus groups, who read the book in a stage somewhere between first draft and near-camera-ready and provide feedback to the author. In this sense a writer’s critique group is a bunch of beta readers for each other.

That feedback notion is what I’ve had trouble with. I’ve buddied up with other writers to read and critique their book-length works, and them mine, only to have it all go one way. I fulfilled my part of it but didn’t receive the promised feedback on my work. Then I had my first, unpublished novel, Doctor Luke’s Assistant, that a relative in my wife’s family wanted to read. As these were older people, I wasn’t expecting feedback. But they passed it on to a younger relative, who did give me some feedback. Part of what she wrote was, “I found some typos, perhaps as many as 50.” To which I asked, “Did you mark them?” To which she answered, “No.” As that was unsolicited feedback, I couldn’t be too upset. But why wouldn’t someone mark typos on a printed copy of a book on which they intend to give the author feedback?

On Documenting America, I sent that out to perhaps six beta readers, or seven including my wife, and received limited feedback from one. The feedback he gave me was valuable, mainly which told me that he wasn’t really my target audience. The feedback that my wife gave me, that she didn’t want to read beyond chapter 1, indicated that she wasn’t my target audience (so I guess I received limited feedback from two betas).

From my call for beta readers for FTSP, I received six responses. The books are all in their hands, or in one case in the mail. My nephew Chris is more than halfway through and is e-mailing me the typos as he encounters them. Since he is a rabid baseball fan (unfortunately for the NY Yankees), I hope he’ll give me feedback on the plot and on the baseball situations. Finding typos is of huge value. Knowing the plot makes (or doesn’t make) sense, knowing the book hits (or doesn’t hit) home, knowing someone would (or wouldn’t) recommend this book to their friends is also huge—just as valuable. I have a ninth person to send it to, a former colleague who asked for it some time ago but who didn’t respond to this particular request. Nine is a good number, especially for a book about baseball.

This time I asked for something specific: feedback of whatever nature the betas wanted to give me within 30 days. I realize this is a gift people are giving me, and no matter what I ask for it is a gift—I can demand nothing. People are busy. Good intentions are often overwhelmed by the necessity of living. Got it.

So we’ll see how this goes. I’m hoping for at least five responses out of nine. I’ll be anxious to see if these people are in my target audience. I’ve always thought I write the type of books I like to read, and if I like to read them there’s got to be a couple of million other people who would like to read them. DA is perhaps changing my opinion about that.

Brain Dead and Body Tired

I’m along this weekend, batching it while the wife is in Oklahoma City helping with grandkids as first one, then the other, parent has been off for conferences. So I should be living it up, right? Getting done all those things I never seem to do when Lynda is here. Writing up a storm.

Instead, I’m basically immobile. I sat through three days of corporate meetings this week, and the inactivity left me exhausted. I’ve come home and had no energy. My blood sugar has been pretty good, so that’s not the problem. My right knee is killing me, and my left knee is not back to 100 percent, residuals of the tick disease of the summer. So I come home from work and crash. I slept well last night, then napped some this morning and even an hour this afternoon. So I’m in good shape for sleep.

I’ve done some work on writing. I received the cover for the print version of Documenting America on Friday, and uploaded it to CreateSpace. Today I received the email saying it was all accepted. All that’s left now is ordering the proof copy, and deciding on price and payment methods. I’ve also been proof-reading Doctor Luke’s Assistant in preparation for publishing it electronically. I haven’t had the energy to get back to writing for content sites.

So, I’m going to muddle through for a while, and hope my body, aided here and there by medicines, is able to fight off this rheumatoid arthritis attack spawned by the tick-borne bacteria. Now to leave the comfort of my chair in The Dungeon, limp upstairs, and head to Wal-Mart.

Pro vs. Amateur: Reading About Writing

Going back to the Victoria Mixon post on Storyfix, the second item she wrote about that differentiates the professional from the amateur is reading about writing. That is, seeking, finding, ingesting, digesting, and otherwise using advice about writing. While the post was specifically about written works about writing, I suppose it could apply to oral presentations as well.

The criteria Victoria gives is the professional approaches books on writing, not as providing magical formulae to success, but as “illumination on a craft for which [the writer] has already to lay a foundation. Not said explicitly is the reason the writer reads about writing: to improve in his profession.

This leads to a problem area, a problem that is growing with the length of the information super highway. How do you sift through the incredible amount of advice available is a mark of a professional or an amateur. The pro is “alert to similarities in different writers’ ways of giving the same advice. They’re mentally cataloging the intricacies of each aspect of the craft as they find them elaborated upon in different directions.”

At a writers conference three years ago a writing couple taught a one hour elective on “The Magic Paragraph.” They said they had studied numerous successful novels, and found that these novels always had a sequence of paragraphs that included a magic paragraph with a certain frequency. I took the elective because of the intriguing title. The presentation of the material was good. We received a handout and I took notes. When I got back to my writing, however, I quickly forgot everything I learned in the class. Of course, I was on the typical conference overload, put the notes in a folder, stashed the folder, and forgot about it.

The idea of a “magic paragraph” is alluring to an amateur writer. It sounds like all I had to do was stick one certain type of paragraph in my writing every so often, and I’d have a best seller. Well, of course the overall writing had to be good. And the plot had to be good. And the sequencing of scenes had to be such that the modern reader’s interest would be held. The pro writer would recognize that what the writing couple was saying was every so often you need to break up the paragraph structure and content so as to keep the reader’s interest.

I don’t do enough reading about writing. I admit it; it’s a lack I somehow need to carve out time for. But when I do read about writing (be it on-line or in a printed book or magazine), I feel that I can discern fairly well whether the advice I’m ingesting makes sense and is something I should follow. That’s a good feeling.

Professional vs. Amateur Writer

I go a fair number of places on the Internet to hobnob with fellow writers, or to seek out advice on how to improve my art and craft treatment of writing, or even to learn more about the business of writing. I don’t always bookmark these sites, nor do I track my browsing history very carefully.

A few weeks ago I came upon a post, or maybe it’s a website, titled Top Ten Tuesdays, run by a man named Larry [Something]. Without searching for the site again, I’m not sure but that it might actually be titled StoryFix. On March 14, 2011, he had a guest post by a writer named Victoria Mixon. Or possibly she’s an agent or editor, I can’t tell from the printout I’m looking at. Victoria’s guest post was titled “The Bootstrapping Writer—The Secret at the Core of Competency”.

Her post begins with these words: “Writing is about growing up.” She then proceeds to describe the differences between a professional writer (which I assume she means grown up) and an amateur writers (which I assume she means not grown up). She has ten items related to the writer’s life where they can demonstrate professionalism vs. amateurism. I’m going to discuss some of these in a series of short-ish posts to the blog. But I’m only going to concentrate on the professional side. I think the amateur side will be understood.

Writing: Professional: “The professional aspiring writer approaches the writing as a craft, a complex, challenging set of skills they must develop as fully as humanly possible in the short lifespan they’ve been allotted, in the context of art—that extraordinary impulse to put into words aspects of life that have never been given words before.”

Is that possible? We’ve been told there is nothing new under the sun. So how can a writer say things that haven’t been said. We’ve been told there are really only three plots: man against nature, man against man, man against self. So how is it possible to create something new?

And yet, this is exactly what readers want, and what writers have to strive to achieve. Being able to achieve it is the difference between the amateur and the professional. I hope I’m achieving it.

Writing: The next tasks

Time is always a factor in my life. I try to do a lot, and never have time to do all I want. I had a to-do list for this weekend. I’ve been able to do some of it, but not all. I wanted to resume writing articles for Internet content sites. Revenues have gone up at Suite101.com, despite the fact that I haven’t written an article there since February. Ideas have been developing for a number of articles for that site.

Then there’s Decoded Science. This is a fairly new content site, somewhat specialized. The owner of that site is a Suite101 writer, and she invited me to write for the site. However, while I was working intently on In Front of Fifty Thousand Screaming People I couldn’t find the time for it. Now that I’m done with the novel, I should write a few articles for DecSci and see what that site can do for me. I can think of several articles that would fit somewhere on the site.

I have begun research on the next volume of Documenting America. I’m thinking of having most of the chapters on documents from the Civil War era. That may simplify things. I don’t have definite plans for it yet, but ideas are beginning to gel.

Of course, sales of Volume 1 aren’t doing so well. I need to do some more promotion, and may start on that soon. I continue to ponder whether I should write a newsletter for the DA series, which I would call Citizen and Patriot. It would be only 2 pages to start with, and I would use it to promote my other writing as well. However, I’m not quite ready to make a commitment to that. Possibly I’ll write a couple and see what the time commitment is, and what it will look like.

I have more to say, but I think my readers of this blog will become tired of my constantly proclaiming what my writing projects are, so I’ll close. I hope to write three blog posts a week at each of my blogs. Tonight, I think, will be a planning night for all these endeavors.

The Book is Written

Last night, about 9:45 PM Central Time, I put the closing words on In Front of Fifty Thousand Screaming People. Well, that’s not quite true. A few minutes later I thought of something I meant to say in the last scene, so I added that in, just one more sentence. The word count is 87,079. That’s 2,000 more than I was shooting for, based on my understanding of what the market will accept for a book like this.

So what’s next? I am tied up with my day job exceedingly between now and Friday evening, so will ignore FTSP. This weekend I hope to do some more wood sawing and splitting, keeping on working and building my muscles, and hopefully driving away the lingering effects of the ehrlichiosis. I have other writing to do: some articles for two different web sites, some non-fiction book stuff, as well as research for those. So I plan to let FTSP sit on the computer (properly backed-up, of course) for a week, maybe two.

When I get back to it, I’ll finish printing it, then read through the whole thing on paper. I’ll be looking for typos, as well as plot inconsistencies and places where the action isn’t adequately described. Also I’ll be looking for problems such as excessive telling rather than showing, head hopping, info dumps, etc. Although, I’m pretty sure I don’t have any info dumps, and that I used a nice mix of showing and telling. Head hopping I don’t really care about, but I’ll be watching for it. I suspect this will take two weeks.

Then, after the plot consistency review, I’ll do my own line and content edit. This will be looking for better ways to say what I wrote, in fewer words, with stronger verbs and fewer adjectives and adverbs. This should take three weeks or even a month. After that will be another proof reading. I will likely include what I call a “software edit”; that is, using MS Word features to search for typically overused words, such as that, there (not referring to place), -ly words, -ing words, forms of “to be”, etc. I’ve somewhat trained myself not to use too many of these as I write the first draft, but they creep in unawares, and must be rooted out.

So that all adds up to two or three months of editing, maybe less if I can find concentrated time to do it, and don’t distract myself too much with other works. Surely by that time I’ll have heard back from the agent, be it pass, accept, or more info. At that point I’ll have to give serious thought of how I want to publish it—especially if the agent passes. Self-publishing will be an option on the table.

Concept to published in 6 hours

I posted the following at the Absolute Write forum today.

Dean Wesley Smith has a blog post today about a 3,000 word short story he just published, currently free on his website, also available through the usual e-book distribution channels. I assume it being available for free is a temporary promotional event.

In the blog post he talks about how this short story came into being. From the concept to the writing to the e-book formatting to the cover creation was approximately 6 active hours. If I’m reading the blog post correctly, those 6 active hours all occurred in less than 24 hours.

Is this the future of e-self-publishing? Or even close? I haven’t read the story yet beyond the first few paragraphs, and I’ve never read anything by DWS except his blog for the last month or so.

The comments have been interesting. The first four commenters said they hoped this wasn’t the future of publishing, that no way could a writer do all that in six hours elapsed time and have it in polished enough form for sale. The fifth commenter, an experienced, mid-list novelist, said it’s not unusual for a professional writer to have publishable copy at the first draft stage.

Speed of getting work before the public is one of the advantages of e-self-publishing (eSP). You conceive it, write it, polish is, format it, do something big or small with a cover, and publish it. No gatekeepers stand in your way. Lack of print layout and production drastically increases the speed.

The counter argument is that without the gatekeepers, nothing prevents an author from rushing a work to “for sale” status without the proper vetting and editing. The result is that lots of garbage works clog the e-book catalogues, making the reader gun-shy about purchasing eSP books.

So who’s right? As with most arguments, probably both sides are to some degree. The speed factor works for the writer but may work against the reader, or at least much of the time will work against the reader.

It’s something to think about.