Every time I start thinking about being able to devote more time to writing, something in my life blows up. Some days I grow so weary in well-doing I don’t see much reason to care. That’s where I am right now.
Maybe all will seem better in a few days. I hope so.
Right now I have six works in progress, and don’t give a you know what whether I finish them or not.
I won’t be posting on Friday this week. Maybe not for a while.
No, that’s not of a prize fight. That’s rounds of edits in my novel Preserve The Revelation.
Though, I’m not sure but that thinking about novel writing, or maybe any book writing, might not be better described in terms of a boxing match. In this corner is The Manuscript, in rough draft. It needs much work to be able to win the fight. It’s rough around the edges, maybe even in the middle. It has great potential, but can it be molded into a quality work?
In the other corner, is Mild-Mannered Author. He thinks he can win this fight and make Manuscript do anything he thinks it should. But does he know his characters? Does he manage conflict in a way that keeps the reader engaged and turning pages? Does he know scenes and sequels; or, if he doesn’t know that writing technique, does he intuitively grasp the principle behind it and pace the book according to it? Does he understand the Magic Paragraph, and does he space these throughout the book? Can he even find his notes from the conferences where those concepts were taught?
How many rounds will this take? For the prequel to this, Doctor Luke’s Assistant, I think I went through four rounds. That was my first novel, and should take longer to craft to perfection, right? If that took four rounds, surely this one will take only two.
I e-mailed a copy of the Word file to my next beta reader, asking him to have it back to me by March 1. I’ll print a clean copy of it tomorrow, to take with me as I travel this week. I’ll be on a plane to Atlanta on Tuesday, to attend the annual conference of the International Erosion Control Association there from Wednesday through Friday, returning home late on Friday. I’m hoping in those days to get all the way through it myself. I’ll hole up in my hotel room for three nights and read-away. With luck, I’ll have my second round of edits done and typed by the time I get comments back from my beta reader.
That means, if two rounds of edits will really be enough, I’ll have the book ready to publish some time around March 4. I’ll take three or four days to format for e-book and print, and publish them. The cover is well underway. The cover photo is chosen and approval to use received, and needed artwork on it is commissioned and will shortly begin.
There’s many a slip, but it could happen on this schedule. I’m starting to get excited.
Since August 2016, in the mornings, after I get to work, get my coffee, fix my breakfast half-sandwich, and have my devotional time, I’ve been working on my bibliography of Thomas Carlyle’s compositions. I had done a lot of work on it before, and had almost all of his known works entered. But I wasn’t sure of their composition order; nor did I know whether there were other works that prior bibliographers missed.
I started work on this at least five years ago, but laid it aside when other items pressed. Then I worked on it from late 2014 to about September 2015, but laid it aside again. From August 2016 until this week, my morning routine has included a half hour with Thomas Carlyle. During these months I made significant progress. I had, back in 2014-15, done the main entries, then researched in his letters to put in order those compositions up to around 1830. Since August till last week I was up to 1841. I had moved from his years of writing mainly magazine articles to mainly books. So the compositions were fewer, and the research easier.
I know I’ve written about this before, but bear with me while I go through it again.
This work is tentatively titled Thomas Carlyle: A Chronological Bibliography of His Compositions—or something close to that. I want to get his works into the order they were written. His first bibliography, published the year of his death (1881), had his articles grouped by magazine, and his books chronological by publication date. But it missed a lot of his unattributed pieces. The next one, published in 1928 by Isaac Dyer, picked up most of those unattributed works, but arranged them alphabetically. He also had a chronology, but it didn’t include every composition.
From 1963 through 1965, G.B. Tennyson published a book and some related magazine articles on Carlyle. In these he included chronological bibliographies, of his prose and his poems, for the period up to the publishing of Sartor Resartus in 1834 (but going to 1840 with the poems). Then, in 1989, Rodger D. Tarr published what is seen as the definitive bibliography of Carlyle. It is arranged chronologically by date of publication, though contains many notes to help establish a chronology.
So, I’ve found these four bibliographies of Carlyle’s works. What need is there of another? Perhaps none. But none of them were what I wanted for my Carlyle research. I wanted to know the order he wrote things in to try to determine the changes in his writings and tie those to the events he was part of. I think I found one such key event, and I’m working on a book about it. But, to be certain, I needed to know the order in which he wrote everything. Not finding what I wanted, I decided to produce it myself.
I think I’m around 70% done with the bibliography. So why stop now, you ask? I’m just too busy. When I look at my writing/publishing to do list for 2017, and try to establish some priorities based on publishing, the bibliography is low on the list, and will likely be for two or three years. Other things are more important. In a future blog post I’ll again go through my 2017 plans, and update my readers on where I stand with them.
In fact, I’m not sure I’ll ever publish the bibliography. I don’t know that it has much commercial potential. Carlyle scholars are few. Those interested in his works may be a few more, but still not many. No, I’ll work on other stuff for a while. Maybe in six months or a year the urge to finish this will resurface, and I’ll get at it again. But for now, Carlyle and his works will have to lay dormant to me.
Feb 10, 1948. A beautiful, Spring-like day in southwestern Kansas. That evening, three young people headed from Meade to Fowler, adjacent towns between Dodge City and Fowler in Meade County, to attend a dinner among friends. Alas, weather predictions being what they were in 1948, they didn’t know a massive blizzard was just over the horizon. It started snowing while they were eating dinner. Later, around 10 p,m., the three decided to drive the 10 miles back to Meade. They didn’t make it; all three perished in the blizzard.
Saturday just passed was the 69th anniversary of when the first of the bodies was found. I think. Records aren’t clear, memories of things that old are few and fading. Most likely the three died on the 11th, though their bodies might not have been found until the 12th or 13th.
Two of those who died are the younger sisters of my mother-in-law, Esther Barnes. I had heard bits and pieces of the story over the years. About 18 months ago I asked Esther if she would talk with me about it, and let me write the story for the Meade Historical Society website. She said yes, and I interviewed her in our house over a couple of days. It took me a few months to complete and sent to the Historical Society for them to upload. You can read it here. If for some reason that link doesn’t work for you (looks funny to me), try this for the index and click through to the story.
When I interviewed Esther it was 67 years after the event. I knew it would be painful for her, and it was. But she gave me the details she knew about, most of which she heard from someone. She lived in Fowler at the time, newly married and with a 9 month old son. They had no phone, so she only heard about it days later as the news got around.
Saturday was the 69th anniversary of that event. At the supper table, Esther said, “I still think about the girls,” by which she meant the sisters. Several times during our meal she teared up. 69 years, and still the mourning goes on.
I understand this. It’s been 51 years since my mother’s death, and I still think of her most days, and wonder what life would have been like if she hadn’t had the terrible illnesses and died from them at age 46. It certainly would have been different. Yes, the years have deadened the mourning some, but it’s still there.
I’m not sure there’s really a point to this post. It’s just something that I want to share.
Oh, if you get to the Meade Historical Society site, you’ll notice the article is listed at the “Buzzard of 1948”. I just notice that, and will ask them to fix it. If you read the article there, you’ll find a number of typos and an some awkward formatting. I remember fixing those, so I must have sent them the wrong file, because I remember fixing those items. Just suffer through them. I’ll find the right file and send it for re-uploading.
As part of my research for Documenting America: The Civil War Edition, I picked up a used copy of The Civil War, by Harry Hanson. Originally published in 1961, my paperback copy dates from 1991. The book is about 650 pages, with a dozen maps and a fair index.
My overall recommendation: If you must read a book about the Civil War, I think you can do better than this. However, if you like battles and details about military conflict, you might like this.
I picked this up used (like so many of my books) for $1.00, thinking it might be a good reference for my book. About four or five months ago I started reading it, but laid it aside. When I picked it up again in December, I started reading where the bookmark was, in the chapter on the Monitor and the Merrimack. I continued on, through endless battles.
That’s what this book mostly was, the battles—between the Union and the Confederacy, and between the Union generals and their superiors. Much time was given to McClelland’s difficulties with Lincoln, Stanton, and Halleck. Once McClelland was given the book, the battles became between his successors and their commander-in-chief.
The battles are interesting, of course, but the book bogged down on them, focusing on them, almost to the exclusion of politics and other national issues. The materials I’ve gleaned from the Annals Of America have been much more useful for my book. When reading of battles, it becomes impossible to keep the generals straight, except for the few top dogs. So I was reading about some battle, an important battle, and how Brigadier General Smith pushed back Major General Jones’ division, with the help of General White’s cavalry and Colonel Black’s artillery. But which side was which of these on? At the beginning of the battle description the author gave the main units for each side, and who their generals were, but remembering all of them by the time you get a few pages into the description was impossible; at least for me it was.
The paperback has a few maps, none of which are particularly readable. A map with the units and their commanders on it would have been most helpful. Even just a simple map with cities and the location of armies would have been good. But the book didn’t have that.
When I got to the end of the book, I went back to the beginning to refresh myself on the Introduction/Preface/Forward—whatever was in the book. When I did so I discovered I hadn’t started from the beginning. I must have skipped the first few chapters and gone right into the battles. Silly me. So I read those chapters, which were about everything that happened before Fort Sumter. They were actually pretty good.
So, if I go to Amazon or Goodreads and rate this book, what will I give it? Certainly not better than 3 stars. It’s not a bad book; just not what I was looking for or needed for my research, not did I think it was a good general history of the war and the times. If I need to know something about a battle, I can go to Wikipedia (don’t laugh; for things like battles it’s actually quite accurate and useful, with good maps on the screen) for everything I need, supplemented by my two encyclopedias. So, I won’t be keeping this book, nor rereading it. Into the yard sale stack it will go.
I had a certain blog post scheduled for today. Often I write my Monday post on Sunday and schedule it for posting Monday morning. This weekend, however, was extremely busy. I won’t go into details. Suffice to say I had a long list of chores to accomplish. I got all but two of them done. One I might do tonight; the other will have to wait till next weekend, when I’m home in the daylight.
My computer time was limited to trading accounting on Friday evening, and household budgeting on Saturday morning. I read blogs, kept up on Facebook and e-mail, but otherwise I didn’t go near the computer.
What took my time was editing. Of my completed novel Preserve The Revelation. I got a little done on this last Wednesday and Thursday (or was it just Thursday?). My goal was to get to page 200 in it, having gone through just page 30 as the weekend started. I figured if I could get to page 100 on Saturday, I had a good chance of making my goal. Alas, when I went to bed Saturday night I was a little short, maybe around page 90 to 95.
So Sunday, after church and lunch, I went to our sunroom, with a mug of coffee, my smart phone, and the notebook with the manuscript. Reading carefully, I spent about 3 hours out there and got a lot done. I even made two batches of Chex Mix, keep the door to inside open so I could hear the oven timer go off and know when to stir it. I felt good about where I was by supper time, but I was still 30 page short of my goal.
I didn’t watch the Super Bowl, not wanting to jinx the Patriots. I kept up on things on Facebook, saw they were losing big time, so kept on editing while a Harry Potter movie was on the television. Later, of course, I learned the Patriots tied it in regulation and won in overtime. I went to the kitchen television and spent close to an hour watching the post game ceremony, the interviews, and the highlights.
That took me to about 10:45, still a little short of my goal. That’s about the time I start getting ready for bed these days, but last night decided to stay up a little late and get some more pages done. I did one more chapter, finishing after 11 at page 201. I made my goal. The manuscript is 293 pages, so I’m getting near the end of the first round of edits. I’ll shoot for 30 pages a night, and hope to finish Wednesday.
So I never got my intended blog post written. It’s a book review, and will take more time than this post will. I’ll do that for Friday, and push others back. I’m happy to do so. Happy at the end of this weekend, with a bunch of work done, my manuscript much farther along, and the Patriots again the NFL Champions.
Editing is something writers either love or hate. Editing leads to revisions. If you’re in love with your words, changing them might be difficult. Even looking at them when you know the result will be changes can be difficult.
At least, I’ve heard that from other writers. For me, I don’t find it to be so. I enjoy the editing process. I like to read what I wrote and see if I can make it better. Most of the time, good editing means cutting words from the document, making it tighter and shorter. Alas, my first editorial pass in anything I’ve written usually increases the words in it. That’s because I realize I haven’t explained something in the plot well, or didn’t touch on a character’s emotions, so I add words. That’s okay, so long as during the second pass through a document I find a way to cut words.
Wednesday evening I began the process of editing Preserve The Revelation. I finished writing it on January 14th. I wanted to pick it up right away and get to editing. But they say the best thing a writer can do is let the book sit for a while. So I let it sit two weeks and three days. I worked on it each of the last two nights, getting through 29 double-spaced pages.
It’s interesting to read what you wrote several months ago. Since I had only a basic plot outline when I started, not a list of each plot element and scenes, the day I started the book I knew how it would end, including the ending conflict, but not how I was going to get there. One of the things I’m editing for is consistency of plot, and whether I have enough references to what might happen in the future. I’m pretty sure I didn’t set up the main conflict well enough. I’m not sure I have enough about the characteristics of all the main characters. This will all have to be added. Then, on another pass, I’ll see about tightening up the text.
Meanwhile, at the office, I spend about half an hour each morning working on a non-fiction book, Thomas Carlyle Chronological Composition Bibliography. I’m past the midpoint of his career, to the point where his works are well known, and the research will be easier. So I’ve shifted my focus a little. Four days I research and add to the text. One day, Friday, I edit. The last two Fridays and today I went through about 20 pages. Today, on my noon hour, I decided to type the edits I have marked. I didn’t quite make it, but I made a significant dent in the typing needed. Since I have no deadline on this book (in fact, I’m not sure I’ll ever publish it), I can take this slowly.
This weekend I hope to edit close to 200 pages in Preserve The Revelation. I don’t know if I’ll make it, but if not I should come close. So long as I don’t get distracted in the times I’ve set aside for that purpose, I should be good.
Why do I enjoy editing so? I’ve helped others to edit their books. I think, if I fail as a writer, I would find it almost as enjoyable being an editor. I guess there’s no understanding why, at times. There just is.
On January 23, I wrote about the fiction series I’m developing of Christian church history. I recently completed the first draft of the second book in that series, and hope to publish it in about a month.
Another series of book-length works that I’m actively working on is my Documenting America series. I have one book out in it, titled Documenting America: Lesson’s from the United States’ Historical Documents. I published this as an e-book in May 2011. I was still learning the ropes of self-publishing, and had only a short story published. I wanted to get a longer work out, but my first novel wasn’t ready, I didn’t think. I wondered what I could do next, and realized I had this book about half done. So I decided to finish and publish it. I added the print book later that year.
I realized I had something here, something that could be expanded. Let me back up a moment, and tell how I came upon the idea for this series. Back around 1998 we—my wife and I—were shopping at Helping Hands, our local thrift store. I saw in the book section a 20 volume set titled The Annals of America. Published by the Encyclopedia Britannica people, it took documents from US history and re-published them. It only cost $25 for the 20 volumes, so I bought it, at the time not thinking beyond the pleasurable reading it would give me.
Then our local newspaper developed a program for guest editorials. I realized I could take an item from the Annals—all of which are outside of copyright—and build them into editorials. I would excerpt the document, write a little commentary about it, and show how it relates to an issue we deal with today. The problem would be doing all of that in 750 words. But I managed to do that, and had four of these editorials published.
Thinking about jump-starting my then-new publishing career, I thought I could develop this into a regular newspaper column. I began writing more. Then I realized the newspaper industry was dead, or close thereto, and learned that self-syndication is a very difficult path. I had written about seventeen of these editorials, however. These became the starting point on the first Documenting America. I fleshed it out to thirty chapters. It was nice not having the word limitation that newspaper columns had.
I wasn’t ready with a lot of new material, but realized DA could be made into a homeschool text, so I went ahead and did that, and published it in 2012. I haven’t sold many of those, though the original DA is my second highest selling book.
I also realized, as I found more and more sources for historical documents, that there was no end to the books I could write in this style. A friend who read the first one in advance of publication said he couldn’t see what aim I was trying to achieve. I thought about this, and decided it was to help people discover these historical documents, and start reading them. We get history filtered, when we can get it unfiltered in original documents.
I don’t know how well I achieved that with Documenting America and the homeschool edition, but they are out there; people have read them; a few have commented. I’m happy with what I developed. Perhaps someday it will catch on better.
As I said, there’s no end to the books I could write along these lines. Back around 2013 I began work on what I intended to be the second (or third) in the series: Documenting America: Civil War Edition. I was hoping to have this out during the sesquicentennial of the Civil War, which was 2011 to 2015. Alas, I didn’t make it. The busyness of life got in the way. Plus, I was finding it difficult to write the book I wanted to. It was hard to wade through documents, except them, and tie them to an issue of today. I got the book about 40% done, I figure. All events and chapters are identified. A dozen chapters are written, requiring only editing. Four more chapters are started, and three more have the document entered and almost excerpted. My hope is to have this finished and published by May.
After that, who knows? I could take any era in US history and do one of these books. Or, I could base them around key people in our history. Or, I could do them on topics, such as slavery, religion, education, defense, foreign affairs. I played around with titles once, and was up to forty before I had to think hard.
Titles are easy to come by; books a lot harder. Still, I can see myself trying to get one of these out a year, and building up a nice set of books. Will they sell? Who knows? And, I doubt if I’ll ever get forty written. If I did ten or twelve, I’ll feel like I accomplished something.
My dad was strongly shaped by the Great Depression. Born in 1916, he went to school only through 8th grade. If he entered school at the normal age we think of today, and progressed on schedule, that would mean he “graduated” about 1930. The worst of times was yet to come, but it was pretty bad that year, with no hope for relief in sight.
At some point Dad went to work for “Old Man Angel”, on his farm in East Providence, probably in the Riverside area. Dad said he earned “a dollar a day plus my dinner.” I’m not clear, so long after Dad told me that, whether this was the job he got after he left school, or if perhaps this was a summer job while he was still in school. I don’t know if that matters. He worked five full days a week, plus a half day on Saturday. What did he do with his $5.00? Took it home, gave $4.50 to his mother for support of the family (he had four younger siblings), then went to Labby’s store. There he took his 50 cents and bought his treat with it. He alternated between as many grapes as 50 cents would buy, or as much ice cream as it would buy. He sat outside the store and ate the grapes or ice cream.
This is the story Dad told, more than once. I believe him. Dad didn’t stay out of school. He soon entered trade school to learn the trade of linotype operator. Hot lead machines that set the type for newspapers or magazines. I’m not sure how many years this school might have been. Dad learned his trade and learned it well. As soon as he graduated from trade school, he went to work at
the Delmo Press in Pascoag, R.I., working there until he went in the army for World War 2, and for a brief time after the war till he went to work for the Providence Journal.
My guess is Dad probably graduated from trade school around 1933 or 1934. This was now some of the darkest days of the Depression. No doubt Dad felt himself fortunate to have a job, and to keep it. They say the Depression shaped the Greatest Generation into being a frugal lot. My dad was an extreme case of this. The young man of 1936 would not have sat outside Labby’s store and eaten 50 cents of anything in one sitting. He would have denied himself any treat and put the 50 cents in the bank. He was that way until he died in 1997. After Mom died and we kids were out of the house, he lived cheap.
How cheap? I could write post after post of how he lived. I’ll give two examples. He did the coupon thing at the grocery store. I imagine he’d love the couponing shows we have now. But, not only did he use many coupons, he tracked his savings, writing down how much he saved and keeping a running total each calendar year. On our phone calls he would often say what his current amount saved for the year was. In true frugalness, he didn’t keep this on a pad of paper. Pads were something you bought new. Dad would never be so extravagant as to do that. No, he took envelopes he received in the mail—bills or junk mail—slit them open, and used the inside and back of the envelope to keep his tally.
The other example was how he would look for dropped change on the ground, usually when he walked his dog. He knew where to look. At the gas station he looked around the air pump and vacuum machine. “Especially after the snow melts,” he told me. Around the newspaper box was another place. It always surprised him how people could drop money and not be bothered to bend down, search for it, and pick it up. But other people’s carelessness was his gain. And, he tracked how much money he found on the ground—and wrote it and added it, you guessed it, on the back of an envelope.
That was all introduction. With us kids, our allowance started when we were 8 years old (I think he started my younger brother a little younger, with a smaller amount). At 8 we received 25 cents a week. It wasn’t a gift. We did chores for that. It doubled every two years, so that at 10 we received 50 cents, at 12 a dollar, at 14 two dollars, and at 16 the whopping sum of $4.00 a week. It stayed there so long as we were in school, even if we had a job. As soon as we left school, the allowance stopped.
As soon as we received the allowance, we had to keep track of our money. Dad made each of us three kids matching banks, just different enough that we could tell which one was ours. Each Thursday, which was his payday, we had to present our “accounts,” and, if the total in our little notebook didn’t add up to the amount of money in the bank, we would not receive our allowance.
You think I’m joking? Not one bit. Week by week, year by year, for eight years, we kept our accounts, and Dad checked them. If we had a discrepancy, we made sure to find it first, figure out if we had bought something we’d forgotten to write down, and wrote it. Each entry had to have a date. Now, before you think Dad was hard on us, I think he often relented when our money didn’t add up. He would help us to remember where it went. Or, if we lost money, he would allow us to write “lost” and an amount, recalculate, and give us our allowance, with a promise to do better next time.
When we reached 16, and our allowance went to $4.00 a week, we no longer had to account for our funds to get our allowance. Dad wrote in our books, something like Your 16 now. If you haven’t learned how to handle your money by this time, I can’t help you any more. And, he added encouragement to be frugal, responsible, and disciplined in our approach to money.
I can’t tell you how happy I am that Dad put us through this discipline. I won’t say I’ve done it as rigorously now as I did when the every-Thursday reckoning came around. But I still track my funds. I still balance my checkbook. If the amount is off by even a penny, I search until I find the mistake. I keep a spreadsheet of every non-cash purchase, but including cash withdrawn, and put them into categories, add them up. If they don’t match the total in the checkbook, savings, and H.S.A. account, I have to find the discrepancy. I kind of wish I had saved my account notebooks (they were small—the kind that fit in a shirt pocket—and my bank. They would be nice keepsakes now.
I wonder if my biggest failure as a parent was that I didn’t keep this discipline with my children. Of course, for a time their accounts would have been in dinars and fils, rather than dollars and cents, but, hey, it’s still money. Maybe, even without this, I transferred some sense of the right way to be disciplined with money. I hope so.
My first novel—and book—was Doctor Luke’s Assistant. Begun December 2000 and finished January 2003, I intended for this to be a stand-alone book. I had a story to tell, a story that came to me as a result of years of Bible study and a couple of years of daydreaming. Never did I think I would someday try to have a writing career. I had a story to tell, nothing more.
But, as I started to shop DLA for publication, I soon learned that publishers didn’t want to publish a book. They really want to publish a writer who wants a career as a published author. That meant I had to have another book. And then another, and another, till infinity, death, or the apocalypse. I went back to brainstorming.
The next books that came to me were my first baseball novel and my poetry book. Nothing came to mind concerning a follow-up to DLA. Nothing at first, that is. Eventually the brainstorming came back to it, and I thought of another book, a sequel. Thus Preserve The Revelation was born. The idea came to me probably around 2009-2010; I don’t remember exactly. For sure it was by 2012. PTR would feature Augustus, the point-of-view character from DLA. He would be called to help the apostle John write his gospel, then later The Revelation. It would involve his sons in kind of a torch-passing event. This sequel was on my radar and in my mind for those several years. Finally the circumstances were right to write it, beginning last October and ending January 14th. It’s currently waiting for me to come back to it and edit it, then publish it.
As I thought about PTR, and the need to have a constant supply of books for the publishing mill (even though by this time I had decided to go the self-publishing route), and, as I read various documents preserved from early church history—something I do for enjoyment and edification, other possible books in the series came to me. To explain exactly what I mean by this, I need to briefly describe a little more about DLA for those who haven’t read it.
The premise behind DLA is that Luke goes to Judea to write a biography of Jesus. He hires Augustus, a Jew from a family that has given up on Judaism and embraced Roman ways, to assist in the research. The story is told from Augustus’ point of view: the research, the writing, the troubles with both Jewish and Roman authorities. In the end the gospel of Luke is written, though it’s nothing like what was originally intended.
So the story is how a lowly clerk/scribe, called an amanuensis back then, should have a big impact in telling Jesus’ story. That’s the same theme carried into PTR, with Augustus and his sons playing the same role, with similar results. As I brainstormed more books, I realized the number of documents in early Christianity, documents which survive in whole or in part, or which are referenced by just slightly later documents, is large. How large? In just the First Century and the first half of the Second Century, potentially eight to ten over and above the scripture. To the end of the Second Century might add that many more, and more and more as each century progresses. In the first four centuries I would probably have 100-200 documents to choose from.
I eventually developed a plan for the series from this. At present, the plan is for only eight books, taking it from the early New Testament era to the middle of the First Century. Here’s a list of the books in chronological order. Given that the first book is a prequel, I’m obviously not planning on writing these in that order.
Adam Of Jerusalem: Backstory for Augustus’ family. The document(s) in question will be those thought to be the sources for Matthew and Luke in writing their gospels, the Passion Narrative and “Q” (Jesus’ sayings/teachings). Time frame: 39-40 A.D. Main character: Adam, Augustus’ father. His decision to leave Judaism and embrace Roman ways will be part of the story.
Doctor Luke’s Assistant: Explained above. Time frame: 63-66 A.D. Main character: Augustus
The Sayings: The writing of the Didiche, the sayings of the apostles. Time frame: 70 A.D. Main character: Augustus
Preserve The Revelation: Explained above. Time frame: 95 A.D. Main characters: Augustus and his sons
The Corinthian Problem (tentative title): The writing of “1st Clement”, an epistle written in Rome to the church in Corinth. Time frame: about 100 A.D. Main characters: Augustus’ sons, Adam and Daniel.
Ignatius of Antioch: The story of Ignatius being marched from Antioch to Rome, to his martyrdom, and the epistles he wrote during this trip. Time frame: 111 or 112 A.D. Main character: Augustus’ son Daniel
The Heretic: The story of Marcion, a Christian of the day whose views were eventually determined to be heresy. Time frame: 140 A.D. Main character: uncertain at this time. It may be one of Augustus’ descendants, or may be another family of scribes—or both.
The Martyr: The story of Polycarp, especially his being martyred. This story will actually tie in with Preserve The Revelation. Time frame: 150 A.D. Main character: uncertain, but one of Augustus’ descendants.
Some of the dates above are approximate. I’m writing this blog post from memory of past research. Oh, and a ninth book from this era might be The Shepherd.
So eight (or nine) novels planned at the moment. One written and published; one written and awaiting publication. Four I’ve been thinking of for at least three years. And three that came to mind in the last six months. That ought to keep me busy for a while, especially when all my planned books in other genres are factored in. If I get most of these eight or nine written and published, I’ll have time enough to extend the series to the next hundred years of church history.