Book Review: The Letters of Vincent Van Gogh

This was the paperback version I read, 10 to 15 pages most days.

As I’ve said before on this blog, I enjoy reading letters. I bought a number of books of letter collections, used whenever I find them. Some of these are keepers, already read or waiting to be. Others are “nice to have to read once things” that will go in the donation box once read. The only thing keeping me from reading books in either category is time.

I recently decided to take time to read The Letters of Vincent Van Gogh, which I bought a number of years ago at a used bookstore. I’m not an artist, don’t care a whole lot about art, but I do care about letters and knew Van Gogh was famous (or perhaps infamous), so figured his letters would be interesting to read. Thus, after finishing another book, I scanned the bookshelves in my new office and this one jumped out at me. Perfect, I thought. An interesting read then a slight reduction in my library.

Van Gogh’s famous self-portrait.

And that’s the way it turned out to be. First, I learned that all the letters in my paperback copy—340 pages set in 10 pt font, so a bit hard to read—were to his brother Theo, and it was an edited collection, not comprehensive. An editor selected the ones he thought best. There were a lot of them, representative of the full range of Van Gogh’s adult life. Normally, I prefer to read correspondence, the back and forth between two letter writers. But I’ll take letters, all outgoing, and find good reading in them.

That’s what these letters were. They mostly dealt with Van Gogh’s artist career. Theo was also involved in art, but as a dealer for an art brokerage house. Van Gogh mentioned a large number of contemporary artists and discussed their techniques and results. He did a lot of comparing himself to them. Sometimes he mentioned various masters of the past.

Much of his discussion had to do with what paintings or drawings he was working on at the moment. Since I don’t know a lot about his paintings, I’m sure some he discussed are famous. A student of Van Gogh as an artist would no doubt enjoy hearing what he thought of his own work at he produced it. He wrote about his techniques, problems he had procuring models, about finding lodging and space for a studio, about trying to get colors and perspective right. Fascinating stuff to this duffer on art.

Occasionally, Van Gogh spoke about family. He was thankful for Theo’s financial support, which was the only way he could do his art. Vincent sometimes mentioned other family members (parents, siblings, uncles, aunts), but less so than I would have expected in letters between brothers—unless the editor decided not to include mainly family letters.

About the demons that troubled Van Gogh his last couple of years, demons that led him to commit suicide at age 37, the letters say relatively little. The same about the famous incident with his ear. Included was a memoir of Vincent’s life written by Theo’s wife.

If you are into art, or a fan or student of Van Gogh, you likely would enjoy it. I did. But, even though I feel good rating it 3.5-stars, it’s not a keeper. To the donation box it goes, according to plan.

 

Not Useful

Trying to remember why I started spot-reading this.

I have e-books on my cell phone to read at odd moments, such as waiting rooms. I have them as Kindle books, Nook books, and Google Books. Different books on each service, more books than I’ll ever to be able to read in this lifetime.

Document one of four in this discussion.

I recently had one of those odd moments and went looking for something to read. My choices at the top of the Nook and Google  reading stacks didn’t excite me. I had just finished a book on Kindle in the previous odd moment. The next book in line was titled WTJ+53.2. What the heck is that? I wondered. Opening it, I found it was an issue of the Wesleyan Theological Journal, probably Vol. 53 No. 2. You might wonder what I, a layman, is doing with a theological journal on my phone. I actually scan that journal’s archives about once a year, and once in a while have found nuggets applicable to what I was teaching in adult Sunday school class or to support something in one of my books. So it’s a good thing to have to browse or read in one of my odd moments.

Document three in the chain.

I opened the book. I had previously opened Vol 53 No 2 to an article and read approximately 1/3 through it. The article was “Miracles, Theodicy, and Essential Kenosis: A Response to John Sanders” by Thomas J. Oord, [Oord 2018]. I had/have never heard of Sanders, but I recognized Oord’s name from a news story, so must have decided to download and read this article. I finished the 21-page article about a week ago, and am just now setting down my thoughts.

It is Oord’s response to an article by Sanders titled “Why Oord’s Essential Kenosis Model Fails to Solve the Problem of Evil While Retaining Miracles” in Vol. 51 No. 2 [Sanders 2016] of the same journal. Sanders had critiqued Oord’s book The Uncontrolling Love of God: An Open and Relational Account of Providence [Oord 2015]. Oord says in his 2018 article that in his 2015 book he referred to Sanders’ 2007 book, The God Who Risks [Sanders 2007]. Oord doesn’t say his book is in response to Sanders but does mention devoting a chapter to Sanders 2007. So this is the progression of documents being discussed:

  • Sanders 2007: The God Who Risks (book)
  • Oord 2015: The Uncontrolling Love of God (book)
  • Sanders 2016: Oord’s Essential Kenosis (article)
  • Oord 2018: Miracles, Theodicy, etc. (article)

This reminded me of engineering journals and how they did things. They would publish an article and invite discussions. People would write in discussions (either criticism or agreement), then the author would have a “closure”, which was a refutation of the various discussions or once in a while acknowledgement that the writer (of a discussion) had something valuable to say. I participated in that process once, in the late 1970s, early in my career. A journal published an article on wastewater treatment processes that seemed off the mark. I wrote a discussion on it, but, due to my relatively junior status, elected to mail it directly to the author rather than to the journal for publishing. The author called me, was very angry that someone would dare to question him, and kept saying, “You don’t know sh— from Shinola.” I let the matter drop. Somehow my boss got wind of it and gave a copy of the original article and my discussion to our chief process engineer. He said my discussion was spot on, that the author didn’t know what he was talking about, that he would handle this, and that the journal he had previously respected and published in had obviously gone downhill.

All I’ve read in this progression is Oord 2018. On the first page were the words ontological, epistemic, theodicy, and of course kenosis. Not one of those words was ever defined in my engineering classes. I doubted that I would ever have to use one of them teaching adult Sunday school. I doubt they’ve been used in the SS teacher’s books I’ve studied from. I should have abandoned the article and closed the book right there. But I read on, struggling all the way with the concepts I barely understood and through Oord’s many uses of the current buzzword “I affirm…” I even re-read the first third of Oord 2018, since there had been a long time lag between my initial and final reading of the article.

I have no expertise in the areas of Oord’s and Sanders’ back and forth, so obviously can’t engage in polite discussion of them as I tried to with the s–S guy. But after 35 years of adult Sunday school teaching and administration, I think I have a little expertise in churchmanship and my own Christian walk. Here are my conclusions, for what they are worth.

  • I find nothing in Oord 2018 that will help me live a better Christian life.
  • I find nothing in Oord 2018 that will help me teach others to live a better Christian life.
  • I find nothing in Oord 2018 that is the least bit encouraging or uplifting.
  • Based on this one article, I conclude WTJ obviously isn’t intended for a layman like me and will look for some other scholarly journal to fill my odd reading moments. I also wonder, though haven’t yet so concluded, if those involved in WTS aren’t wasting their time. To be fair, the world they live in, move in, and have their being in doesn’t seem to be my world. Most likely someone gets good help from reading this.
  • While kenosis might be essential (or unessential, taking it to the opposite logical conclusion), it is most likely none of these four documents are and I won’t be looking for the three I’ve not read.

I’m not an idiot. BS and MS degrees. Nine Bible study books written and self-published. A dozen other Bible studies developed and taught. Close to two dozen engineering articles presented at conferences or published. But I’ll be danged if I can see any reason to waste time on the stuff of this article.

What’s Next?

This will certainly be task one, making needed additions and corrections.

As I reported in my last post, my 8-volume Bible study is done. I suppose nothing is ever done for the self-published writer, because there’s always things to do (improve covers, check for formatting errors, fix the dreaded typos once found). But I can lay all that aside for a while and move on to more pressing items.

I hope I get back to this series fairly soon.

But what’s next? I’ve been thinking that through for some time and have been developing a mental to-do list. Monday evening I started writing the items down. Let me list them here. It’s a combination of revising existing works, completing long-planned works, and trying to figure out if anything that’s been keeping my brain from resting is worth pursuing. I’ll give the list as bullet points.

  • Do my income taxes. The deadline approacheth. I started on this yesterday. Looks like I owe the IRS.
  • Make additions and corrections to the book of letters from our years in Saudi Arabia. I added the recently found letters on Tuesday and re-formatted the chapter. I need to check the formatting of the entire book, then re-publish.
  • Make additions and corrections to the book of letters from our years in Kuwait. That will include adding a lot more photos.
  • Put together the book of my father-in-law’s service in WW2. This includes syncing up his war letters with his war journal, and finding enough photos to add a little spice. I started on this on Wednesday, loading the first 20-odd letters into a file. On Thursday I proofread them and made corrections. I can see that I’m going to have to do this differently.
  • Write/publish book three in The Forest Throne series, tentatively titled You Can’t Change The Past.
  • Write/publish book four in The Forest Throne series, tentatively titled Lost In Time.
  • Decide if I want to do any more books in the Documenting America series. Ideas for more books have been refusing to leave me alone, but they take a lot of research and writing.
  • Decide if I want to write a book with the tentative title Nature: The Artwork of God. That’s another thing that’s taking up brain space.
  • Get a start on a couple of essays I’d like to write and publish.

That’s enough for both short-range and medium-range planning. I’ll have to see how it goes.

 

 

Book Published: “He’s Alive”

The series is finished. Time to make a few tweaks and move on to something else.

Well, it’s done. My Bible study series A Walk Through Holy Week. On Saturday I typed a few edits from my last read-through, formatted the book for Kindle and print, created the e-book cover, and uploaded the e-book to Amazon. By the end of the day, it was approved and live for sale. This volume actually goes beyond Holy Week and covers the Easter season up to the Ascension.

I suppose I should say it’s “almost done”. I still have to create the print book cover and upload it. That’s hopefully a one-hour task today. Then there will be creating and uploading improved covers for the entire series, because the covers right now could be much better. But new covers can wait for a long time if need be.

I declare the eight-volume series done. The final word count for all eight books is somewhere between 320,000 and 330,000. Of course, total sales thus far for Volumes 1-7 is zero, so I don’t have great hopes for calling the series a success.

Now, it’s time to figure out what to do next. A plan is beginning to gel and will be the subject of a future post or two.

Routines

The worst part of moving, apart from downsizing to a house about 1/3rd of what we had, apart from going from a mostly rural area to a fully developed city subdivision, is trying to establish routines.

I am a creature of routine. Give me the same thing to do every day and I’ll be happy. Up at 6:30, work on writing, stock trading from 8:15 to 8:45, breakfast at 9:00, more work in the office (writing or household budget), reading at noon, lunch at 1:00, etc. I like routine.

Alas, my routines were stolen by our move from Arkansas to Texas.  For the first two weeks I did nothing but move and unpack boxes. At the two-week mark I was able to resume stock trading with a partially set-up office. Then a crisis of missing medications that took a few days to work out. Then I was able to resume my writing work, more editing at present as I’m trying to get previously written works ready for publication.

I’m slowly getting routines established. My reading place is now the screened patio instead of the sunroom. The Dungeon has been replaced by an office, now mostly fully set-up in the 3rd bedroom. My evening reading place is sprawled out on the living room floor while we are without easy chairs. Tuesday this week I was able to get the minivan registered. That’s one big, non-routine item I had facing me. Now I can concentrate on re-establishing routines.

Not so fast. On Wednesday I went through a pile of mail and worked on changing addresses, filing documents, and learning to use my bank’s remote depositing feature. Oh, yes, and using PayPal to pay a bill for the first time.

Routine is returning, though more slowly than I would like. I’ve figured out when I need to have outgoing mail for the mail carrier to pick it up. I’ve started to learn when local utility bills are debited. How long it takes to get to church to know when to leave home to be on time. I’m not sure when I’ll be ready to reestablish a routine for posting here, but I’m working on it.

Book Review: Imperial Highness

Catherine and Peter never should have married. This is the story of how Catherine dealt with it.

My wife and I don’t read many of the same books. Even our Bible study and devotional books are different. That’s one of the reasons our home library is so large. I’m trying to pay more attention to what she’s reading (to be a dutiful husband) and at least consider reading books she recommends to me. One of those was Imperial Highness by Evelyn Anthony.

This historical novel, first published in 1983, is closer to a biography than a novel; yet it meets the technical definition of a novel. It’s about Princess Catherine, of a somewhat lesser German principality, who at age 16 married the future tzar of Russia. It was an unhappy marriage, as the tsarevitch was hard to get along with and the two teenagers were ill-suited for each other.

Anthony paints a very unhappy picture of Catherine’s life. Both partners found love in the arms of others and rarely saw each other except at official court functions. Spoiler alert: Catherine does a better job of winning public opinion to her and winds up as empress, deposing her husband after his mother’s death.

This is a good, relatively short read. It’s difficult for me to pigeonhole it as to genre. Consider it biography masquerading as historical fiction. It’s worth reading if you like that kind of book.

I give it 4-stars. I’ll never read it again, but I might do some other research on Catherine. It’s not a keeper, however, and I rise from my office chair right now to put it in the donation box.

Progress?

It’s not The Dungeon, but it will have to do.

I haven’t written much about our time in Texas since our move. The first couple of weeks were overwhelming. Since then, we have become a little more settled, though we are far from being through with the move and set-up. Here are some bullet points.

  • We aren’t tripping over boxes. We still have many to unpack, but they are shoved against walls and out of the way, mostly in the dining room and the guest bedroom.
  • I’ve set up my office in the 3rd bedroom. No more Dungeon, I’m afraid. It’s nice to have everything on one level.
  • I’ve resumed writing work on a regular basis. This morning I finished the second editing pass through the last volume of my eight-volume Bible study series. One more quick read-through in a Kindle format then I publish. Then I need to decide on which of about five writing projects to do next. This week I replaced my ancient wireless keyboard, so typing should be easier.
  • Change of addresses are slowly being accomplished.
  • The refrigerator is slowly getting filled, as each shopping trip we buy an item or two that was left behind in the move. I haven’t felt much like cooking, but have prepared a few things.
  • Lynda and I have found time to walk a short way several days this past week. Maybe over time we can do more before summer heat and humidity move in.
  • We are slowly getting plugged in at church.
  • We’ve met three of the four neighbors that border our house. The fourth one always has vehicles in the driveway but never seems to be outside when we are.
  • I’ve been able to get in some good reading time, as well as resume correspondence.

That’s enough for now. I’ll give another update in a couple of weeks.

Book Review: Genesis in Space and Time

A good read, solid biblical scholarship. I’m glad I read it.

I’ll call this the Disappearing Book. I remembered having bought Francis A. Schaffer’s Genesis in Space and Time many years ago, sticking it on the shelf, and waiting for it to pop to the top of my reading list. It popped up a couple of years ago, and…I couldn’t find it.

I was sure we hadn’t gotten rid of it in a book purge, but it was nowhere on my Bible study shelf. Ah well, I thought. I picked another book that I had on the Biblical book of Genesis, read about half of it and gave up and donated the book. It appears I never reviewed it on the blog.

Ah, but then, when I was packing books to move to Texas, I found it! Right where I thought it should be. I put it at the top of the current reading pile. That was in early December. We got to Texas in February, and early this month I was ready to read it and…couldn’t find it! What was going on with this book? I knew where all the books were from our partial move in December, so I went through my bookshelves book by book. I finally found it, and realized the fact that the text on the spine not quite matching the book title was what threw me off this whole time.

I finished the book on Saturday. While it not being quite what I thought it would be, I have to say it was enjoyable and well worth reading. Schaffer didn’t get into a lot of details on items long debated by scholars, such as: old earth vs. young earth, were Adam and Eve real people, did the flood really happen, or the tower of Babel. He stated positions on these, summarized what we can know from secular scholarship, and didn’t get into the two sides of the debates.

If you’re looking for a book that will summarize the evidence for an old earth and compare that to why many Bible scholars believe in a young earth, this is not your book. Look elsewhere. But if you want a well-reasoned discussion of what Genesis stated in chapters 1-11, giving the implications of those chapters for humanity, by all means seek out this short book (160 paperback pages) and read it. Here’s an example of the type of discussion you’ll find in it.

As I said in regard to the use of the Hebrew word day in Genesis 1, it is not that we have to accept the concept of the long periods of time modern science postulates, but rather that there are really no clearly defined terms upon which at this time to base a final debate.

Thus, the answers to the questions I ask in each book review: I give this a solid 4-stars, with no temptation to go higher. It’s unlikely I will ever read it again. It is not a keeper, but will be donated after I pull a few more quotes from it.

Thinking About Lyrics

I used to sing this song as I walked on my noon hours while still working, and worked on the changes in the lyrics as I walked and sang.

Quite a few years ago, I came to associate Roger Whittaker’s song “The Last Farewell” with the West Indies. Since my visit to St. Lucia last November, I’ve been associating it with my ancestors’ homeland.

Here’s a link to the song, after which I’ll paste in changes I made to the lyrics (which I not so humbly think are an improvement), along with a fourth verse that I wrote. I stumbled on the paper I wrote them on today. I hope the changes to the lyrics are enough that this doesn’t violate copyright. Unfortunately, WordPress is not letting get the spacing I want between stanzas.

The Last Farewell
A ship lies rigged and ready in the harbor
Tomorrow for old England she sails,
far away from you land of endless sunshine
to my homeland with its rainy skies and gales.
And I must be aboard that ship tomorrow,
though my heart breaks as we come to this farewell.
For you are beautiful
and I have loved you dearly
more dearly than the spoken word can tell.
[repeat refrain]
I hear that there’s a wicked war a blazing,
And the taste of war I know so very well.
Even now I see the foreign flags a-raising.
Our guns are aimed as we sail into hell.
I have no fear of death, it holds no sorrow,
yet how bitter do I find this last farewell.
For you are beautiful
and I have loved you dearly
more dearly than the spoken word can tell.
[repeat]
Though death and darkness gather all about me,
and my ship be torn apart upon the sea,
I shall smell again the fragrance of these islands
in the heaving wave that brought me once to thee.
Or should I return safe home again to England,
I’ll have memories undimmed by this farewell.
For you are beautiful
and I have loved you dearly
more dearly than the spoken word can tell.
[repeat]
My darling it’s been decades since we parted.
I pray the years have kept you safe and well.
I never could return to what we started
once my life became a clanging carousel.
But daily there are scenes that I still borrow
from a treasure buried deep at our farewell.
For you are beautiful
and I have loved you dearly
more dearly than the spoken word can tell.
[repeat]
Yes, you are beautiful,
and I still love you dearly,
more dearly than the spoken work can tell.

Book Review: “The Allegory of Love”

Not sure I will finish this.

One of my goals is to read all of C.S. Lewis’s works: books, magazine articles, and misc. stuff. I’d like to do this more or less in order written, the same as I’m doing to the works of Thomas Carlyle. Except prior to deciding to read them in order, I read The Screwtape Letters back in 1975 when I hardly knew who he was. Then I read several of his later works.

Then I decided to start at the beginning of his adult writing career. Except I decide to skip his first two early poetry books, Spirits in Bondage (1919) and Dymer (1926). That got me to Pilgrim’s Regress (1933), which I read a few years ago. Next in line is his 1936 academic treatise The Allegory of Love. Written while he was building his academic career as an Oxford don and tutor, it is considered a masterpiece.

I approached it with trepidation, however, since I am far from a scholar. Would Lewis be speaking to me at all? Would I understand him. Let me answer that by inserting a quote from the second chapter.

It is true, as I said before, that the Psychomachia is not a good poem: if it were indeed the result of some purely unpoetic purpose it could hardly be worse. But there are many ways in which poetry can go wrong and an impurity in the intention is only one of them. The Psychomachia fails, partly because Prudentius is naturally a lyrical and reflective poet—that is some fine, cloudy grandeur in the Hamartigenia—to whom the epic manner comes with difficulty, and partly for a deeper reason.

I have no idea who Prudentius is, never heard of him until reading this section, never heard of the two poems mentioned, so obviously can’t understand what Lewis is talking about.

At this point, 70 pages into this 360-page book, I don’t expect to finish this. I’d like to get 1/3 of the way in before I decide to quit. That will take me four or five days to get to that point at the rate I’m reading it.

My preliminary conclusion: unless you can get this book for 50¢ as I did at a garage sale/thrift store, or unless you are a dedicated C.S. Lewis scholar, don’t waste your money and time on this.

I’ll come back with final conclusions when I either finish or abandon it.

Author | Engineer